ready rock moe rex ([info]moebius_rex) wrote,
@ 2005-07-07 13:17:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
grinding our wicked gears to the beat
when mechanical teddybears lose in love, they paint their heartbreak all over town, using their own oil as the medium

Symbolyc One and Illmind Featuring Strange Fruit "The Broke Song" - Don't struggle, just hustle: Here's a tidy bit of mellow hip-hop for all y'all who've ever had to deal with the difficulty of stretching that last dime to the month's end--which probably means it applies to just about everyone but the cheesy skeezy Paris Hilton types out there. It's an interesting treatment of a subject that's troubling for all who have to deal with it--they could've chosen to come off hard, with a really dark "message" track, but it instead projects a nice, laid-back groove, easy like quitting time on a hot summer afternoon. Message: I'm done broke, but I'ma workin' hard and got hope.

This joint comes to us via Symbolyc One (aka "S1") and Illmind, a newish and notable production duo who hail from Waco/Dallas, TX and Newark, NJ, respectively. You can find it on their debut album The Art of OneMind, which on the whole is a masterful blend of warm soul, cool jazz, and top-flight hip-hop flow. Totally worth checking out, especially if you're in the mood for a break from some of the more steroidal beats being slung around the hip-hop scene these days. [Buy The Art of OneMind or The Broke Song EP at Studio Distribution.]

I discovered these guys through last month's Sumosonic CD sampler. For those of you not yet in the know, the media promotion company Heavy puts out a great CD of some of the best underground music happening at the current moment (their last CD was their very first "all hip-hop" edition, and it included tracks from fairly well-known heads like Roots Manuva, Ghostface, Z Trip, and Slum Village alongside relative unknowns like The Gray Kid, Minors Into Fire, and Black Spade). If you're a US or Canada resident, Heavy has a deal where they'll send the Sumosonic CD to you for the low, low cost of $5US per month, which they say covers shipping & handling. It's an excellent deal, and a great way to discover new music (alongside mp3 blogs such as this one, of course :D ). [For more info about the monthly Sumosonic CD deal, go here.]

The Fort Knox Five "Radio Free D.C. " - Wake up! Time to free your mind! Whenever I hear that the Fort Knox Five--a Washington D.C. production team with ties to the Thievery Corporation--have pressed something new to wax, I get that twitchy "gotta gotta hear it" thing goin' on, 'cos they never, ever turn out a weak beat. "Radio Free D.C." shows the FK5 in fine form yet again: 70s blaxploitation soundtrack funk guitar licks, horn fills, tight percussion, a bit of vocoder steez, the works. But it's the guest vocalists who really make this piece special: it features a sharp bit of political consciouslness courtesy of veteran rapper King Kamonzi ...and, as icing on the cake, some great radio DJ patter by none other than His High Hip-Hop Holiness Afrika Bambaataa himself. It's the kind of thing that makes you want to run out into the street in yr shorts and turn the fire hydrants on full blast. Even if you don't live in the inner city, even if it's not particulary hot/humid where you are right now. I'm tellin' ya. [You can get "Radio Free D.C." (and its remix on the flip) at Groove Distribution (US) and Juno (UK). The Fort Knox Five also did most of the production on Afrika Bambaataa's recent solo album Dark Matter Moving at the Speed of Light, which you can purchase via Amazon.]

Plantlife "The Last Song (Skylab Remix)" - And now to get you all flippyfloppy like a crash test dummy, I'm closing out this entry with "The Last Song." It's the latest single from LA-based act Plantlife, whose weird, warped blend of electrotechnofunkrock + rap always tears the roof right off of whichever structure it's being played within. And this remix by electrohouse producers Skylab is especially dynamic; it totally turns the track up to 11+ with its crunchy rawk gitars and hyperdrive beat. Is it the ultimate, the top, the song to end all songs? Probably not, but it's definitely good for dancing oneself into a righteous stupor, especially when things are going nuts all over the world and all day long inside your telly. Who knows how long we've got? Rock out while you still can, brothers and sisters. Yeah, they're dropping bombs, we're writing songs...they say that we're the criminals, but we're just tryin' ta spread some love. [Buy this EP at Juno (UK). "The Last Song" originally appeared on Plantlife's recent album The Return of Jack Splash, which you can pick up in the US at import prices via Amazon. Hopefully someday someone will wake up and release it domestically....]

((((^_^))))

Well, for a couple of generally humble homebody folk, my sweetie and I sure are travelling a lot this summer. I'm off to supastylin, freshtastic GREEN BAY WISCONSIN this weekend for Molls' family reunion. Will try to return with some crazy electropunk polka jams for y'all, plus also maybe a slice or two of yummy rhubarb pie. If I somehow don't manage to post next week, it's because I'm stuffed too full of that good ol' midwestern home cookin.' I'm salivating already and my plane doesn't leave for at least 18 hours yet. :D :D :D

Next up: NYC at the end of the month (July 28-31), for a wedding in BKLYN. Lemme know where the parties are at, y'all.

Kiwi pals: we're still working out our dates for the November NZ/OZ tour. Will send 'em soonish.

Late update: Astute observers of my front page sidebar--all two or three of you (everyone else probably reads this via an LJ "friends' page" or RSS)--have probably noticed that funny little Operation Yellow Elephant button at the top of my "politics, schmolitics" links. This is, to paraphrase Oliver at the Liquid List, "a blog-driven initiative to help young Republicans who support the war in Iraq to find the strength to let their asses cash the check that their mouths have been writing for two years."

Have any necon conservative pals of military fightin' age who endlessly rant on about the wonderfulness of the Iraq liberation/occupation but somehow can't seem to find the cojones to actually go over there themselves? Well, now that recruitment goals are consistently not being met, month after month, it's kind of imperative that these boys and girls shut their yaps over here and take the fight over there, where it belongs. Tell them you're sick of their craven cowardice. Guilt them into going to the front. Whatever it takes! We've got a war to win, after all, and who better to fight it than its most steadfast believers?


(Post a new comment)

Oooh...
[info]bishopjoey
2005-07-07 02:16 pm UTC (link)
I am so looking forward to downloading these joints when I get to the office tomorrow. They sound damned sweet, especially FK5, as I spent the evening shaking my expanding belly to Thievery Corporation who wail something fierce.

Happy and safe traveling to you and your Molls.

(Reply to this)

Plantlife are/is from LA, not London
(Anonymous)
2005-07-07 08:03 pm UTC (link)
For what it's worth. But thank you for posting the track. Love me some Plantlife

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Plantlife are/is from LA, not London
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-07 08:57 pm UTC (link)
Aw man, I'm always getting that particular detail wrong. Meant to confirm their home base, then forgot. Thanks for the correction!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Yellow Elephant!
(Anonymous)
2005-07-07 08:07 pm UTC (link)
Hey dude, this is the same guy who just posted the nitpicky Plantlife correction. I just read the rest of your post and saw you're down with Yellow Elephant! We're like brothers from another mother. I definitely think you'll like my blog (http://miblogweighsaton.blogspot.com/), especially this post here about a recent run-in I had with the College Republicans. You might have seen it, as it was linked to by Jesus's General (http://miblogweighsaton.blogspot.com/2005/06/college-republicans.html).

Nordy

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Yellow Elephant!
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-07 09:07 pm UTC (link)
Actually I missed the General's link to that one--and oh man, it's a howler, too. Hope some of those guys found what they were looking for at 17th and P. And..."one more year"??? WTF? Those kids are precious.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

God..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-07 09:12 pm UTC (link)
God, I can't believe you've bought into the Chicken Hawk meme. Sigh.

Are you sure you really want to accuse all Republicans of military age of being cowards? Does this seem like a tack likely to accomplish anything except smug self-satisfaction and circle-jerk back-patting? Oh wait, that's the far left's current MO.. and it's working ever so well for them. Losing political power, one disgusted centrist at a time..

There's been ample pixels spilt on the ridiculousness of the chickenhawk meme, and I'm not going to retread them all here. I'll just say that the concept of a volunteer army means that some will choose to serve and others will not. This pretense that support of a policy means that one must himself be the executor of the policy is more than a little ridiculous. It makes a mockery of the reality of democracy and civilian control of the military.

One thing I haven't seen someone mention is that these meme would require all those strong-on-terrorism liberals who supported the US invasion of Afghanistan to sign up and fight there. Aren't those who support the war in Afghanistan but aren't willing to go fight there also chickenhawks?

What makes the Iraq war different? Spite?

Bleh. I should stop reading any of your commentary below the music.. :(

=darwin

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: God..
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-07 11:26 pm UTC (link)
Bleh. I should stop reading any of your commentary below the music.. :(

Y'know, as I wrote that addendum, I was thinking that I should probably put some sort of warning label on all of my Iraq War/WOT commentary--something to the effect of "Warning: Darwinbait!" Then you could just stop there, or skip over it, or whatever, and remain blissfully ignorant of my foolish liberal moonbat opinionating.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: God..
(Anonymous)
2005-07-08 05:33 am UTC (link)
Ha! Darwin it's always a joy to read your rants. You're a one-man republican hate machine swimming in an ocean of peaceful liberals. I do wonder how you manage to have such good taste in music.. particularly since 99.9% of musicians you listen to are 'circle-jerk-back-patting' liberals.

Those Bastards.

Mind you I suppose the alternative is Christian Rock. An oxymoron if ever I heard one. Like 'Military Intelligence'.

love and kisses

james headphonesex (http://www.headphonesex.co.uk/)

BTW, surely calling yourself 'Darwin' is for such a staunch republican akin to Satanism?


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-08 07:36 am UTC (link)
BTW, surely calling yourself 'Darwin' is for such a staunch republican akin to Satanism?

Who's a staunch Republican? I'm actually an exceedingly disgruntled liberal.

I have far more in common with the typical Democratic voter than the typical Bush voter. For example.. I didn't vote for Bush. The problem is that the vanguard of my 'side' seems to be represented by people who think it's clever and politically productive to, for example, insult the other side in a logically inconsistent fashion. When their slurs are petty, personal and one can easily blow holes in them the size of (lack of liberal service in) Afghanistan, it's rather difficult for me to get excited about them. These days it seems that anyone who disagrees with the liberal opinion-leaders is accused of being a Republican, a coward or worse. You're either with us or you're a homophobic, Islamophobic, war mongering racist! And people wonder why liberal has become shorthand for screeching, reactionary irrelevance?

This meme really is a perfect case-in-point. Even if those pushing this idea were totally correct and every military age supporter of the Iraq (or Afghanistan..) War is, in fact, a craven coward.. so what? Where does that get us? Absolutely nowhere. When you frame the debate as "either oppose the war or go fight it" there is no further avenue for discussion. It's like the far right questioning the patriotism of the anti-war left.. it's both divisive and pointless. I'd like to believe that my side (the liberals) is better than their side, but every liberal blogger on earth seems intent on proving me wrong. Every moment we spend on these snide, self-serving "campaigns" is a moment we're not spending convincing America of the rightness of our view. It inspires me to rant because I consider it intensely counter-productive, and Bush et al scare the crap out of me, too! That's why I don't enjoy seeing my side play right into Karl Rove's hands at every turn..

Liberals are supposed to be seeking consensus or at least common ground for discussion.. not flinging shit at the other side to impress our true believers. The far right at least has the excuse of intending to be closed-minded. What's our excuse?

I do wonder how you manage to have such good taste in music.. particularly since 99.9% of musicians you listen to are 'circle-jerk-back-patting' liberals.

I'm well aware that the majority of my social and musical peers are somewhere on the spectrum between liberal and extreme radical. Fortunately I don't have to agree with every aspect of a person's worldview to enjoy their art. I can enjoy listening to Dead Prez without being a neo-Maoist, Crass without being an Anarchist, Johnny Cash without being a Christian.. and I can enjoy Ted Nugent without being a hardcore right-winger. I mean, we all love a good wango tango, don't we? ;>

Frankly I wish there were less political/ideological uniformity within the artistic community.. I think that the conflict would lead to more interesting art. It might be nice to consider all these liberal artists to represent an informed and coherent political viewpoint.. but what gives them any special knowledge? They're just artists, and are therefore more likely to be drawn to radical ideas. There was a time when many artists believed that Communism was the ideal path forward, and I think history has shown otherwise.

Ultimately, I stopped relying on art for political education quite a few years back. I appreciate political content in art but it rarely informs me. If we got some more conservative and centrist artists in the mix, we'd at very least see fewer paintings of Bush as a chimp masquerading as art with something to say about life.

When you know you'll be congratulated and lauded for saying one thing, it takes more than a little courage to say something else. What I want are artists who aren't afraid to assign credit and blame where they are due, relying more on personal ideology than the explicitly political. That is, moral and ethical viewpoints which derive from their personal ideals.. not the cynical machinations of political flacks on either side.

BTW, thanks for saying I have good taste in music. I try. :)

=darwin











(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-09 12:23 pm UTC (link)
Personally, Darwin, I'd have an easier time buying all your attempts to define yourself as a "liberal" if you perhaps didn't seem to spend so much of your time and energy ferociously cutting down your liberal friends' peers' (to use your pet term) arguments with the latest RNC-approved and Instapundit-spun talking points. It would also be gratifying to see you anywhere near as angry with the Bush Administration as you apparently are with the liberals with whom you claim to identify. I really have no idea what liberal policies and agendas you hold dear.

Up above, you say Every moment we spend on these snide, self-serving "campaigns" is a moment we're not spending convincing America of the rightness of our view. Fine, but unfortunately, using the logic I've seen you display against your "peers" during the last few years that I've been of your acquaintance, any attempt to convince America of the "rightness of our view" is a doomed-to-failure loony leftwing liberal "campaign." I don't know what other strategy you espouse for the left but silence, abject complacency, and utter deference to the messages and policies of the right.

If you're half the liberal you say you are, you'd spend less time helping the other side by attacking your own at every turn, and much more time finding effective ways to help us get our messages across "correctly." We'd all love to know what we need to do in order to have Rove fall into our hands next time, rather than the other way around.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-09 01:37 pm UTC (link)
We'd all love to know what we need to do in order to have Rove fall into our hands next time, rather than the other way around.

The first step is to stop openly displaying contempt for those who disagree with you. For example, the amount of times I've heard my peers imply that all Republican voters must be stupid or racist or homophobic or religious nuts. Or even the assumption that anyone who disagrees must be a Republican or a war-monger, islamophobe, so on and so forth. We could stop the casual contempt for "red staters" and "chickenhawks" and "rethuglicans" and all those other clever sobriquettes. It may be good for a chuckle, but it's a dead-end strategy. All of the southern Republicans who used to be Democrats, for example, decided to switch to the party which at least pays basic lip service to their values and lifestyle.

Mostly my problem is with the inability to acknowledge any validity to the other viewpoint, the knee-jerk construction of all opinions as a reaction to the dominant viewpoint. It seems like the Democrats are advancing very few actual ideas of their own, preferring to be reactive and reactionary. Quick, name three Democratic policy initiatives of the last four years! Now you can say "oh, well they're a minority party, of course they can't advance bold ideas." My personal view is that until they advance policy ideas of their own they will be stuck reacting to Bush's agenda.

John Kerry, who would have been President and promised visionary plans to deal with Iraq, recently proposed LEGITIMIZING THE MILITIAS OF IRAQ and drafting them into the official Iraqi defense forces. Yes, the Badr Brigades, the Peshmerga, the religious and sectarian militias. This is the sort of bonehead idea he would have implemented to improve our situation in Iraq? God. Beyond that, the Democratic vision for Iraq seems to be abject withdrawal or.. more of the same. But faster and better! Is there some leading policy light whose visionary strategy I'm missing? Because the Democratic leadership certainly doesn't seem to have any ideas..

I really have no idea what liberal policies and agendas you hold dear.

There's a wide variety of ideas which I hold which should be considered liberal. I'm opposed to censorship, I believe in equal opportunity, that drugs should be decriminalized, that gay people should be allowed to marry, that abortion should be legal, religion should be seperate from government and education, fetal stem cells should be used for science, corporations should be kept in check, energy and resource conservation, blah blah blah blah. I'm sure if I spent a few more moments I could extend the laundry list out. Tell me that set of views makes the Republicans my natural party.

If you're half the liberal you say you are, you'd spend less time helping the other side by attacking your own at every turn, and much more time finding effective ways to help us get our messages across "correctly."

I don't have any magic bullet. All I know is that whenever I read the leading lights on the left side of the blogosphere, I come away insulted and disgusted. If someone who is as liberal as I am (or at very least holds so many liberal views for a conservative) has that reaction, what do you suppose the reaction of an actual centrist Republican voter would be?

The most basic shift that needs to occur, in my opinion, is a recovery of the vanguard from the MoveOn/DailyKos lunatic fringe. There is a gigantic mass of voters in the center, and for some reason the Democrats seem to think that becoming ultra-liberal will convince them. I think ultimately there needs to be fresh moderate ideas coming out of the Democratic vanguard before any productive change occurs.

Incidentally, it's your blog and you can reply or not reply to whatever you want.. but if you're going to stand behind the chickenhawk smear I'd still like to hear your perspective on those who supported the Afghanistan war but didn't sign up to fight there. Alternately, we could discuss what percentage of the military is conservative.. and what this might say to liberals accusing conservatives of shirking military service.

=darwin




(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-09 01:39 pm UTC (link)
PS - Comment length limit kept this out of the previous reply :

And as to the idea of expending my outrage on Bush et al. Sorry, I'm not from the Department of Redundancy Department. There's more than enough outrage directed toward Bush from my peers. I really have very little need to stand up and say "me too, guys!" because I have zero expectation of being able to change their agenda. I think it's within the realm of possibility that I could shape the agenda of my peers, so that's where I focus my energy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
(Anonymous)
2005-07-10 08:58 am UTC (link)
Sorry, I'm not from the Department of Redundancy Department.

But Darwin, that's exactly my problem with you. You are redundant. Every time you attack your "fellow" liberals, you employ the same argumentative strategies as those of the right-wing. Every frickin' time. Which is why your "peers" all tend to immediately lump you in with the Republicans. If this approach doesn't work when liberals use it against conservatives, why do you think it'll work for you?

If you're really that interested in shaping the agenda of your peers, perhaps you ought to focus your energy on coming up with a few of those policy proposals that you were talking about. I agree it's terrifically easy to relentlessly tear things down all day, so show some gumption and some smarts and provide all of us errant liberals a model of someone who builds stuff instead.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-10 01:50 pm UTC (link)
If you're really that interested in shaping the agenda of your peers, perhaps you ought to focus your energy on coming up with a few of those policy proposals that you were talking about. I agree it's terrifically easy to relentlessly tear things down all day, so show some gumption and some smarts and provide all of us errant liberals a model of someone who builds stuff instead.

If the Democratic party is relying on me for policy ideas, they're in bigger trouble than I thought. ;)

=darwin

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-12 11:27 am UTC (link)
Yeah, they would be in a lot of trouble, because you apparently have no ideas worth mentioning.

Darwin, I seriously think the best thing you could do for your fellow liberals and democrats is sign up. Focus all this anti-peer, anti-left, anti-jihadist, anti-Islamic anger you are so embroiled in towards its obvious target--Iraqi insurgents and terrorists. It's more obvious than ever to me that your nation (and your party, and your political affiliation) needs you to be an example for us all.

This is the last time I'll ever respond to a comment you make in my journal--I'm just weary of going 'round & 'round the block with you. Good luck and godspeed, pal.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: God..
(Anonymous)
2005-07-12 05:22 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, they would be in a lot of trouble, because you apparently have no ideas worth mentioning.

Is it really the responsibility of citizens to come up with fresh policy ideas for their respective parties? Isn't that what policy wonks, senators, congressmen, NGOs and so forth are for? Someone should tell 99.44% of bloggers, columnists and other pundits that their commentary is totally meaningless because they have "no ideas."

Really I don't get the substance of your dig here, but I guess that's par for the course.

Darwin, I seriously think the best thing you could do for your fellow liberals and democrats is sign up. Focus all this anti-peer, anti-left, anti-jihadist, anti-Islamic anger you are so embroiled in towards its obvious target--Iraqi insurgents and terrorists.

Sure thing. Right around the time that all my liberal peers sign up to run for President because they don't like Bush. Or sign up for the Peace Corps because they support humanitarian aid. Alternately, when the same peers, who support the war in Afghanistan, sign up for service there. In other words, never.

I object to the characterization of my anger as "anti-Islamic" because a dislike of Islamic extremism is no more "anti-Islamic" than a dislike of Christian extremism is "anti-Christian." I don't like Fred Phelps, for example, but that doesn't make me anti-Christian. As far "anti-jihadist" ... you're god damn right I'm anti-jihadist.

Anti-peer and anti-left are only true to the degree that I see said peers and left opinion leaders promoting ideas which I see as counterproductive to an overall liberal agenda. You know very well by now what I'm talking about, and yes.. this includes ideas like the "Yellow Elephant" campaign.

As to whether I need to be an example to you all.. aren't we all ultimately an example to our peers? We're in a competitive marketplace of ideas, and each person is advancing their set of ideas as more right than others. In other words, trying to call me out for zealous representation of my worldview is the pot calling the kettle black. If not all of us, who?

This is the last time I'll ever respond to a comment you make in my journal--I'm just weary of going 'round & 'round the block with you. Good luck and godspeed, pal.

Well obviously it's your journal and you can choose to discuss or not to discuss as you feel fit.

It seems, however, from your tone here that you're forsaking our friendship as well. I must admit that's a disappointment, but of course it's your prerogrative. I'll simply point out that while we disagree vehemently and frequently, I've never taken it as a personal affront. Apparently, you have.

Sigh. Oh well.

=darwin



(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: God..
[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-10 09:17 am UTC (link)
and that last post was from me, of course. Writing from a computer that's not mine & forgot to sign in....

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kajmal
2005-07-07 09:27 pm UTC (link)
As someone who has had the 'cojones' to sign up, I'll say that it would be horrible if everyone who supported the war went to Iraq. If every American who supported the war went, IT WOULD SURE BE FUCKING CROWDED... wouldn't it? 100 million pastey white asses roaming around Iraq would be even more hell on our public image, I imagine. Plus, not everypone who supports the war is suited for it. For example, as much as I love Darwin, he's the last person I'd want in a foxhole with me when the shit hit the fan.

Also, the recruitment goals are falling short, but really not by all that much. Re-enlistment is way, way up.. so that makes up for most of the recruitment shortfall.

Please, dude. Stick to talking about music, you seem to know it a lot better than you know politics. I was totally feeling what you were saying until you started talking political jibberish.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-07 11:09 pm UTC (link)
Hey man, I'm proud of you for putting those cojones of yours to some use. More power to ya, and good luck in yr next tour of duty.

But ok now, I'm curious. Why do you have such a low estimation of Darwin's military abilities? He's athletic, intelligent, and seems to have an above-average understanding of (or at least interest in) middle-east military strategy and anti-insurgent/terrorist tactics. And his faith in our mission down there is steadfast and unwavering. What am I missing? I mean, if you gave your average military recruiter someone fitting that bill he or she would do everything in their power to enlist that person. Or so I would think.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kajmal
2005-07-07 11:48 pm UTC (link)
For one, his tendancy to second guess. Maybe basic training might make him more prone to instantly follow instructions, but very bright people don't tend to do well in battle. Too many options.

Second, he's professed a morbid fear of death to me. This does not bode well for someone who I might depend on to stick their neck out and draw some fire.

Who knows though? Basic training definitely put a lot of things in me that weren't there before... as it should. Maybe it'd do the same for him. We'll never know though, because he knows he best serves society from his present position.. and I agree with him.

All in all though, I was just trying to prove a point when I said that. He's definitely not the last person I'd want in a foxhole with me, just not the first (or even in the first 10) person I'd think of when asked to give a list of people I would want there. Actually, I'd most rather have someone like him dictating policy or calling the shots from the war room... miles away. Or even at on the horn at Hotel, coordinating air support.

But to drive home my point, there are many people in the military who DON'T really believe in the war, but are fighting it anyway. To me, they have more cojones than the ones who unblinkingly march off into the thick of it, sure of themselves.

It goes back to Socrates' question... and the answer is still the same. The unsatisfied man is always in a position over the satisfied war pig.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

my fitness for duty...
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-08 07:49 am UTC (link)
I actually took umbrage at that line off-line, but I quickly gathered he was over-stating for dramatic effect. But while we're at it, lets evaluate my fitness to serve! ;)

For one, his tendancy to second guess. Maybe basic training might make him more prone to instantly follow instructions, but very bright people don't tend to do well in battle. Too many options.

This is one major reason I do not want to join the military, the fact that I strongly dislike being told what to do. That said, I would assume that if I were ever to be pressed into battle I would have gotten over it to some degree by then. One might, however, point out that the volunteer army is by its nature self-selecting, in that those (like myself) whose personalities are not well suited for taking orders can excuse ourselves. We all have our strengths and weaknesses, and I'm quite sure I'm a better Sysadmin than the typical solider..

Second, he's professed a morbid fear of death to me. This does not bode well for someone who I might depend on to stick their neck out and draw some fire.

Again, I'd presume that by the time someone was shooting at me, I would have come to terms with my (somewhat comically over-stated) neurotic fear of death. At the very least, I feel confident that if someone started shooting at me and mine.. I'd shoot back.

=darwin

(Reply to this) (Parent)

fwiw..
[info]darwinx0r
2005-07-07 10:04 pm UTC (link)
I liked each of the three songs for today. I think the Symbolic is the fave of the three. Nice beat on that, solid flow..

=darwin

(Reply to this)


[info]merzbunny
2005-07-14 09:14 pm UTC (link)
Hey- Ryan from Telephone Thing here. Thanks for the Plantlife remix- it's amazing stuff. Have Skylab done anything else I should know about?

Also, there is a domestic edition of The Return of Jack Splash, it's just listed on Amazon under "Plant Life," not "Plantlife."

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]moebius_rex
2005-07-15 10:52 am UTC (link)
Ah, figures that there's a domestic release of Plantlife. That band's gotta make it clear whether their name is one word or two....

Skylab has apparently been around for about a decade or two,* but I only started noticing stuff by them in the past few years, when they started remixing people like David Holmes and Barry Adamson (a mix for Depeche Mode is also credited to them) along with a lot of lesser known folks. Probably one of the more interesting spots I've seen 'em turn up is as a finalist in a hip-hop remix context over at AfricanHipHop.com.

To be honest, at the time I wrote that entry, I also thought Skylab was responsible for an excellent house remix of Miss Kittin's "Professional Distortion" that came out a year or so back, but it turns out that was Subsky--someone else entirely. Hard to keep track of everyone!

*Long before that, one of Skylab's members--Toshio Nakanishi--was best known for his involvement in a short-lived but much-loved Japanese post-punk electro-pop act called Plastics. I wouldn't be surprised if it's Toshio's guitar we're hearing in this remix.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Totally off topic question for the gurus
(Anonymous)
2005-07-20 06:48 pm UTC (link)
Hey Moebius & Friends,

Sorry to comment totally off-topic, but I thought this to be a pretty enlightened place to ask for help on identification of a track.

I heard it in the movie "The Beat that My Heart Skipped" (which I heartily recommend....a remake of the 70's flick FINGERS. Go check it.) Sounds kinda like Cornershop crossed with Fantastic Plastic Machine or something...

A clip of this track is here (Track #2)
http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0007QCIAC/402-1362286-4937725

Any ideas you fiends?

Thanks either way

Jon

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Found It
(Anonymous)
2005-07-20 10:02 pm UTC (link)
Sorry to bother. Did a little more legwork when I got home and pinned it down.

Sporto Kantes - Impressed

Jon

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…